Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
Executech
E-Government
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Telework
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
resourcecenter
Custom Supplements
Adobe Microsite
Oracle Microsite
CA Microsite



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Court considers dismissing JPL HSPD-12 lawsuit

By Wade-Hahn Chan
Published on January 8, 2008

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

JPL employees' Web site

Appeals court stops some NASA HSPD-12 background checks

Judge: NASA workers must submit to background checks


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily
Homeland Security

To learn more, click here.


NASA contractors who are suing the government over Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 identification cards could face a motion to dismiss this case Jan. 11.

The Jet Propulsion Laboratory employees sued the government and the California Institute of Technology, which oversees JPL, because of background checks required for the issuance of the cards. The employees say the checks would invade their privacy.

HSPD-12 requires all government employees and contractors to be issued standardized ID cards. The plaintiffs believe that they do not need a full background check because they do not have a security clearance and do not work on classified projects.

The Justice Department, which runs the HSPD-12 background checks, filed the motion to dismiss Nov. 21, 2007, saying the possibility of privacy invasion is low. Caltech filed a separate motion the same day asking to be released from the case, saying it had nothing to do with the background check process and shouldn’t be held accountable for it.

The hearing on the motion to dismiss the case comes as a temporary injunction allowing the employees to avoid the background checks remains in place.

The U.S. District Court judge presiding over the case originally denied the injunction, saying that the employees were required only to sign an authorization form that would not cause harm to them. But the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided Dec. 5, 2007, that there was sufficient cursory evidence to show possible privacy concerns and temporarily granted an injunction.

The JPL plaintiffs said they were unsure what would happen next if the appeals court didn’t come to a decision by Jan. 11. They said the hearing could be postponed, or the judge could continue with it but postpone a decision until after the appeals court makes its decision.

“We cannot predict what will happen, and we do not know whether the Ninth Circuit will issue its ruling before the Friday hearing,” the JPL plaintiffs said on their Web site.


upcoming event

IPv6 2008
February 13, 2008

The Federal 100 Awards Gala 2008
March 24, 2008

Knowledge Management 2008
April 28 - April 29, 2008